Improve accessibility in a digital exhibit

Each cell displays an image of a bill and its corresponding drawing, but provides no description for screen readers.
WCAG 1.1 — Text Alternatives
The interactive cursor measures below the recommended 24x24px, making it difficult for users with motor impairments to navigate.
WCAG 2.5.8 — Target Size (Minimum)
The exhibit relies heavily on red-green tones with limited color variety.
WCAG 1.4.11 — Non-Text Contrast
Randomly selected cells are read aloud, giving non-visual users a way to experience each pixel of the exhibit — preserving the artistic integrity of the work without excluding anyone.


A screen reader–friendly structure ensures titles and navigation are easy to move through for non-visual users.

Visual information is translated into sound, giving users an auditory way to experience the exhibit's content.

Randomly selected cells are read aloud, creating an authentic and unpredictable exploration just like the visual experience itself.
Tab-index support enables full keyboard navigation for non-mouse users — ensuring compliance with WCAG 2.1, ADA Title III, and Section 508. Users can explore the exhibit freely, whether in the original or accessible experience.


A verbal guide walks users through the exhibit and its broader context, ensuring the story behind the work is never lost.

Users can seamlessly switch between the accessible and original layouts, giving them full control over how they experience the exhibit.
The redesigned accessibility experience was presented to the Cooper Hewitt team, reimagining 10,000 Cents with screen reader support, keyboard navigation, audio guides, and a toggle between the original and accessible layouts, all while preserving the artistic integrity of the original work.
The project was well received by the Cooper Hewitt team. While the goal was accessibility compliance, what resonated most was the multisensory approach — an interpretation that invited visitors of all abilities to engage with the exhibit in inclusive, interactive ways.
Accessibility and artistic integrity don't have to be in conflict. Thoughtful design can honor an artist's original intent while opening the work up to audiences who would otherwise be excluded from it entirely. If I had the chance to explore user painpoints and accessibility issues after the redesign, I'd question how might blind and deaf users fully engage with the exhibit? How can alt text and narration be expanded to support additional languages?