Improving Event Ticket Flow

Shedd Aquarium / Public Aquarium

Usability

User Research

Eye Tracking

case type

UX Designer

UX Reseacher

Role

Reducing user frustration during ticket checkouts for events

The Shedd Aquarium reached out after noticing a pattern: an unusually high volume of customer support calls related to the "Programs & Events" checkout.
Overview
Research

Goal Identify and improve friction points for users to complete purchases independently and confidently.

Shedd Aquarium reported:

1. High customer support calls from checkout

2. high cart rates abandoments while finalizing checkout

how to optimize the information experience of the MCSSP website

Findings

Results concluded users desired

Understandable copy language and easier navigation

Questionnaire data confirmed the eye tracking signal: users desired more indication to what is a program or an event without needing to decode the company language.

Transparent costs and pricing during checkout

Unclear checkout pricing led to unexpected charges, creating a support burden that was entirely preventable through earlier cost transparency.

Methods

Two methods chosen to reveal different aspects of the problem: quantitative data of user experience and qualitative data of post-testing emotional state.

Eye tracking
using Tobii Lab Pro

Revealed where users were actually looking not where they said they were looking. Heat maps exposed attention black holes and surfaces that drew focus away from key decision points.

Post-session
questionnaire

Captured the subjective experience: how confident did users feel? Where did they feel uncertain? This gave emotional context to the behavioral data from eye tracking.

usability recommendations

The redesigned checkout experience was delivered directly to the Shedd Aquarium, addressing the friction points uncovered through eye tracking and user testing. The final solution introduced clearer program headers, transparent pricing, and a streamlined checkout flow built to reduce confusion and support confident purchasing decisions.

Recommendations

Reduced confusion by improving clarity in content

Rewrote the program headers to make offerings immediately clear. Added financial perk badges surfacing add-on costs and value upfront so users could make an informed decision before committing to a path. Reduced the cognitive work of comparison-shopping by presenting the right information at the right moment.

Created a more transparent checkout process reducing user frustration

Added a step-by-step progress sidebar showing users exactly where they were in the flow at all times. Introduced a transparent, real-time cost breakdown that updated dynamically as users made selections, the final price was never a surprise. Users always knew what they were committing to and why.

Takeaways

What eye tracking taught me that other methods can't

Small language and layout decisions carry enormous weight — what feels intuitive to a designer can be a dead end for a user
Eye tracking makes invisible problems visible: attention patterns reveal confusion that users can't always articulate
Pairing behavioral data with self-report gives you both the what and the whyCheckout friction isn't just a conversion problem.